Journal
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 1082-1092Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1063675
Keywords
Negation; Context; Visual world paradigm
Funding
- Spanish Government [PSI2011-26386, Consolider-Ingenio 2010 CSD2008-00048]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Literature assumes that negation is more difficult to understand than affirmation, but this might depend on the pragmatic context. The goal of this paper is to show that pragmatic knowledge modulates the unfolding processing of negation due to the previous activation of the negated situation. To test this, we used the visual world paradigm. In this task, we presented affirmative (e.g., her dad was rich) and negative sentences (e.g., her dad was not poor) while viewing two images of the affirmed and denied entities. The critical sentence in each item was preceded by one of three types of contexts: an inconsistent context (e.g., She supposed that her dad had little savings) that activates the negated situation (a poor man), a consistent context (e.g., She supposed that her dad had enough savings) that activates the actual situation (a rich man), or a neutral context (e.g., her dad lived on the other side of town) that activates neither of the two models previously suggested. The results corroborated our hypothesis. Pragmatics is implicated in the unfolding processing of negation. We found an increase in fixations on the target compared to the baseline for negative sentences at 800ms in the neutral context, 600ms in the inconsistent context, and 1450ms in the consistent context. Thus, when the negated situation has been previously introduced via an inconsistent context, negation is facilitated.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available