Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity
Jakob B. Bjorner et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative
Jakob B. Bjorner et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)
Inaccurate Estimation of Disparities Due to Mischievous Responders: Several Suggestions to Assess Conclusions
Joseph P. Robinson-Cimpian
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER (2014)
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales: an item response theory analysis of the parent proxy report item banks
James W. Varni et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2012)
Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory
Esi Morgan DeWitt et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008
David Cella et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales
Debra E. Irwin et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2010)
Mode of administration is important in US national estimates of health-related quality of life
Janel Hanmer et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2007)
Response shift theory: Important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability
Carolyn E. Schwartz et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2007)
Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys
TJ Beebe et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Differences in mail and telephone responses to self-rated health: use of multiple imputation in correcting for response bias
JR Powers et al.
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2005)
Measuring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: comparison of responses from self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews
L Kraus et al.
ADDICTION (2001)
Share Paper
