4.3 Article

Estimating the Size of the US Population at Risk of Severe Adverse Events from Replicating Smallpox Vaccine

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 200-209

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phn.12291

Keywords

emergency preparedness; smallpox; smallpox vaccine; severe adverse events; vaccine contraindications

Funding

  1. Bavarian Nordic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo quantify the population at risk of serious adverse reactions to replicating smallpox vaccine. Design and SampleConditions known or suspected to carry risk were identified via Centers for Disease Control and Prevention planning documents, other federal publications, and peer-reviewed literature. Conditions identified were categorized as historically recognized risks or more recently recognized immunocompromised states that may pose risk. Major historical risk factors were as follows: eczema/atopic dermatitis, pregnancy, HIV, and primary immunodeficiency. More recently identified states were as follows: rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, dialysis, bone marrow transplant recipients within 24months post-transplant, solid-organ transplant recipients within 3months post-transplant, age under 1year, and systemic lupus erythematosus. MeasuresThe estimated prevalence or absolute number of affected individuals for each condition was ascertained from peer-reviewed studies, vital statistics, and registry databases. ResultsAn estimated 48,121,280 to 50,028,045 individuals (15.2-15.8% of the U.S. population) are potentially contraindicated to replicating smallpox vaccine. This rises to 119,244,531 to 123,669,327 (37.4-38.8%) if household contacts are included. ConclusionsThese figures are significant and larger than the only previously published study. Understanding this number allows for improved clinical utilization, equitable attention to the health needs of a vulnerable population, and strategic vaccine stockpiling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available