4.6 Article

Food insecurity and mental illness: disproportionate impacts in the context of perceived stress and social isolation

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 86-91

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.11.014

Keywords

Food supply; Depression; Anxiety; Life stress; Stress; Psychological; Social support

Funding

  1. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  2. Canada Research Chairs program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Food insecurity is associated with elevated risk of mental illness. This risk may be further compounded by stressful life events and by social isolation. This study investigated whether the risk of mental illness is higher among individuals experiencing food insecurity along with greater stress and social isolation. Study design: Cross-sectional self-report survey data from the 2009-10 Canadian Community Health Survey (N = 100,401). Methods: We estimated prevalence differences of the risk of self-reported mental illness associated with food insecurity alone and in combination with stressful life events and social isolation. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on a sub-sample who completed a structured diagnostic interview. Results: Overall, the prevalence of mental illness was 18.4% [95% CI 16.7-20.1] higher for women and 13.5% higher [95% CI 11.9, 15.2] for men in severely food insecure households compared to those reporting food security. The increased risk of mental illness associated with food insecurity was more pronounced among females and those reporting higher stress and social isolation. Conclusions: Individuals reporting food insecurity are at increased risk of mental illness. This increased risk is further exacerbated in high stress and socially isolated environments. Policies, clinical and public health interventions must address broader constellations of risks that exist when food insecurity is present. (C) 2015 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available