4.4 Article

Antidepressant, anxiolytic and procognitive effects of rivastigmine and donepezil in the chronic mild stress model in rats

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue 7, Pages 1235-1243

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4206-0

Keywords

Chronic mild stress; Anhedonia; Object recognition; Cholinesterase inhibitors; Rivastigmine; Donepezil; Memantine; Imipramine; Rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of depression in old age is complicated by frequent co-morbidity with cognitive impairment. Anti-dementia drugs have some efficacy to improve cognitive performance and there is an inconsistent literature regarding the effect of such drugs on depressive symptoms. Here, we have investigated whether anti-dementia drugs would have antidepressant-like and pro-cognitive effects in a well-validated animal model of depression and cognitive impairment, chronic mild stress (CMS). Rats were subjected to CMS for a total of 8 weeks. After 2 weeks, subgroups of stressed and non-stressed animals were treated daily, for 5 weeks followed by 1 week of drug withdrawal, with vehicle, imipramine (10 mg/kg), rivastigmine (2 mg/kg), donepezil (0.3 mg/kg) or memantine (5 mg/kg). Sucrose intake was tested weekly, and animals were also tested in the elevated plus maze (at week 7) and in an object recognition task (at weeks 7 and 8). CMS decreased sucrose intake, had an anxiogenic effect in the elevated plus maze, and impaired performance in the object recognition test. Imipramine, rivastigmine and donepezil normalized performance in all three tests. Memantine had anxiolytic and pro-cognitive effects, but did not reverse CMS-induced anhedonia. The fact that all three anti-dementia drugs reversed CMS-induced cognitive impairment and that cholinesterase inhibitors, but not memantine, have antidepressant-like effects in this model suggest that different mechanisms may underlie CMS-induced anhedonia and cognitive impairment. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available