4.2 Review

Hospital staff experiences of their relationships with adults who self-harm: A meta-synthesis

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/papt.12113

Keywords

self-harm; self-injury; relationship; experience; hospital; accident and emergency; staff; metasynthesis; inpatient; care; perceptions; attitudes; nurses; doctors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThis review aimed to synthesize qualitative literature exploring inpatient hospital staff experiences of their relationships with people who self-harm. MethodsNine studies were identified from a systematic search of five research databases. Papers included the experiences of physical health and mental health staff working in inpatient settings. The studies employed various qualitative research methods and were appraised using an adapted quality assessment tool (Tong, Sainsbury, & Craig, 2007). A meta-synthesis was conducted using traditional qualitative analysis methods including coding and categorizing data into themes. ResultsThree main themes derived from the data. The impact of the system' influenced the extent to which staff were Fearing the harm from self-harm', or were Working alongside the whole person'. A fear-based relationship occurred across mental health and physical health settings despite differences in training; however, Working alongside the whole person' primarily emerged from mental health staff experiences. Systemic factors provided either an inhibitory or facilitative influence on the relational process. ConclusionsStaff experiences of their relationship with people who self-harm were highlighted to have an important impact on the delivery and outcome of care. Increasing support for staff with a focus on distress tolerance, managing relational issues, and developing self-awareness within the relationship may lead to a more mutually beneficial experience of care. Equally, structure, clarity, and support within inpatient systems may empower staff to feel more confident in utilizing their existing skills.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available