4.6 Article

Intellectual development of childhood ALL patients: a multicenter longitudinal study

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 508-514

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.4186

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukemia; intelligence; development; performance versus verbal intelligence; cancer; oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundIn childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), radiotherapy for CNS prophylaxis is not used in frontline therapy anymore. Standard treatment for ALL nowadays consists of polychemotherapy. Therefore, assessment of potential chemotherapy-induced cognitive side effects becomes important. Although neurotoxicity was demonstrated in cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies remain scarce. ProcedureWe evaluated intellectual development of 94 pediatric ALL patients between 1990 and 1997, diagnosed before the age of 12years, treated according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Children's Leukemia Group 58881 protocol. Three assessments of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised were performed since diagnosis, according to age. Using repeated measures regression analysis, we investigated the effect of gender (low versus increased) risk group, parents' education, age at diagnosis, intelligence quotient (IQ) subscale (verbal (VIQ) versus performance (PIQ) intelligence), and test session. ResultsPIQ scores were lower than VIQ at baseline (-5.3 points on average, p=0.0032), yet PIQ increased more strongly (PIQ: +3.9 points per test session; VIQ: +0.8, p=0.0079), so this baseline difference disappeared (p=0.0079). There were no clear effects of gender (girls: +0.6 points; p=0.78) or risk group (low risk: +1.5 points; p=0.49), but IQ scores were higher when one parent had followed higher education (+9.5 points, p<0.0001). Finally, diagnosis at younger age predicted lower IQ scores (-1.3 points per year, p=0.0009). ConclusionGiven that IQ scores did not decline, our findings demonstrate a stable pattern. However, the lower PIQ scores at baseline may indicate that performance functioning is vulnerable to acute neurotoxicity. Also, lower scores for younger patients highlight the stronger impact of the disease and/or treatment at younger age.Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available