4.7 Article

Evaluating the association between the SHANK3 gene and bipolar disorder

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 284-288

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.058

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; SHANK3; RT-PCR; SNP; Association

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471358]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Foundation [14411969000, 134119b0400]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support [20152530]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Foundation [201540029]
  5. Shanghai Mental Health Center Foundation [2014-FX-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies have shown that the genes involved in synaptic density and plasticity were downregulated in bipolar disorder (BD) postmortem brains. The SHANK3 (SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domain 3) protein is a scaffold protein enriched in the postsynaptic density of excitatory synapses, and recent findings were suggestive of a possible role of SHANK3 in the development of BD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the genetic association between the gene encoding SHANK3 (SHANK3) and BD in Han Chinese. Methods: Ten variants in SHANK3 were genotyped among 1482 individuals with or without BD. We measured the mRNA expression level of SHANK3 in patients with BD and controls. We then performed an eQTL analysis. Results: In our sample set, there were no significant differences in allele, genotype and haplotype frequencies between the BD and control groups. Our results showed no significant difference in the level of peripheral SHANK3 expression between the BD patients and healthy controls. Further eQTL analysis showed that rs9616915 has functional effect on SHANK3 expression in the hippocampus. Conclusion: This study does not provide evidence for a major role of SHANK3 in the pathogenesis of BD. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available