4.5 Article

Protein biomarkers on tissue as imaged via MALDI mass spectrometry: A systematic approach to study the limits of detection

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 16, Issue 11-12, Pages 1660-1669

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500515

Keywords

Limit of detection; MALDI Imaging; Mass spectrometry; Protein biomarkers; Sensitivity; Technology

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER award [DBI-1054826]
  2. Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U01CA152737]
  3. Canary Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1501900] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MALDImass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is emerging as a tool for protein and peptide imaging across tissue sections. Despite extensive study, there does not yet exist a baseline study evaluating the potential capabilities for this technique to detect diverse proteins in tissue sections. In this study, we developed a systematic approach for characterizing MALDI-MSI workflows in terms of limits of detection, coefficients of variation, spatial resolution, and the identification of endogenous tissue proteins. Our goal was to quantify these figures of merit for a number of different proteins and peptides, in order to gain more insight in the feasibility of protein biomarker discovery efforts using this technique. Control proteins and peptides were deposited in serial dilutions on thinly sectioned mouse xenograft tissue. Using our experimental setup, coefficients of variation were <30% on tissue sections and spatial resolution was 200 mu m (or greater). Limits of detection for proteins and peptides on tissue were in the micromolar to millimolar range. Protein identification was only possible for proteins present in high abundance in the tissue. These results provide a baseline for the application of MALDI-MSI towards the discovery of new candidate biomarkers and a new benchmarking strategy that can be used for comparing diverse MALDI-MSI workflows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available