4.1 Article

Generation and analyses of human synthetic antibody libraries and their application for protein microarrays

Journal

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 427-437

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzw042

Keywords

affinity proteomics; phage display technology; protein microarrays; scFv; synthetic antibody libraries

Funding

  1. EU FP7 AFFINOMICS: Protein Binders for Characterization of Human Proteome Function: Generation, Validation, Application [241481]
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF14CC0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibody-based proteomics offers distinct advantages in the analysis of complex samples for discovery and validation of biomarkers associated with disease. However, its large-scale implementation requires tools and technologies that allow development of suitable antibody or antibody fragments in a high-throughput manner. To address this we designed and constructed two human synthetic antibody fragment (scFv) libraries denoted HelL-11 and HelL-13. By the use of phage display technology, in total 466 unique scFv antibodies specific for 114 different antigens were generated. The specificities of these antibodies were analyzed in a variety of immunochemical assays and a subset was further evaluated for functionality in protein microarray applications. This high-throughput approach demonstrates the ability to rapidly generate a wealth of reagents not only for proteome research, but potentially also for diagnostics and therapeutics. In addition, this work provides a great example on how a synthetic approach can be used to optimize library designs. By having precise control of the diversity introduced into the antigen-binding sites, synthetic libraries offer increased understanding of how different diversity contributes to antibody binding reactivity and stability, thereby providing the key to future library optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available