Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Changes in prostate cancer grading: Including a new patient-centric grading system
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
PROSTATE (2016)
Prostate Cancer Grading A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE (2016)
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens
Guido Sauter et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Clinical Significance of Prospectively Assigned Gleason Tertiary Pattern 4 in Contemporary Gleason Score 3+3=6 Prostate Cancer
Chirag Doshi et al.
PROSTATE (2016)
Re: Nationwide prevalence of lymph node metastases in Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
PATHOLOGY (2015)
Tertiary Gleason Patterns and Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: Proposal for a Modified Gleason Scoring System
Bruce J. Trock et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2009)
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
JI Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2005)
Share Paper
