4.7 Article

Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells with 10.6% efficiency through innovative absorber engineering with Ge superficial nanolayer

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1359-1367

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2797

Keywords

Cu2ZnSnSe4; kesterite; germanium; Na doping; thin-film photovoltaics

Funding

  1. project KESTCELLS [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-316488]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad de Espana under the SUNBEAM project [ENE2013-49136-C4-1-R]
  3. NOVACOST project [PCIN-2013-128-C02-01]
  4. European Regional Development Funds (Fondo Europeo de Desarollo Regional (FEDER) Programa Competitivitat de Catalunya)
  5. Government of Spain for the Formacion de Personal Investigador (FPI) fellowship [BES-2014-068533]
  6. Ramon y Cajal fellowship [RYC-2011-09212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our recently published work, the positive effect of a Ge nanolayer introduced into the processing of Cu2ZnSnSe4 absorbers (CZTSe) was demonstrated. In this contribution, the complete optimization of this new approach is presented for the first time. Hence, the optimum Ge nanolayer thickness range is defined in order to achieve an improved performance of the devices, obtaining a record efficiency of 10.6%. By employing this optimized approach, the open-circuit voltage (V-OC) is boosted for our pure selenide CZTSe up to 489 mV, leading to V-OC deficit among the lowest reported so far in kesterite technology. Additionally, two important effects related to the Ge are unambiguously demonstrated that might be the origin of the V-OC boost: the improvement of the grain size and the corresponding crystalline quality, and the interaction between Ge and Na that allows for dynamic control over the CZTSe doping. Finally, evidences pointing to the origin of the deterioration of devices properties for large Ge concentrations are presented. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available