4.7 Article

Impact of the injection-level-dependent lifetime on Voc, FF, ideality m, J02, and the dim light response in a commercial PERC cell

Journal

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 1448-1457

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2792

Keywords

lifetime; resistivity; ideality; fill factor; dim light; two-diode model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The injection-level-dependent (ILD) lifetime of the silicon wafer impacts many characteristics of the final photovoltaic cell. While efficiency is commonly understood to be impacted by the silicon bulk lifetime (at the maximum power point injection level), this work demonstrates the wide ranging impacts of ILD lifetime on the V-oc, the fill factor (FF), the diode ideality factor m, and the dim light response. Instead of a two-diode model, we utilize a boundary+ILD bulk lifetime model to analyze a commercial passivated emitter rear contact (PERC) cell featuring an AlOx dielectric rear passivation. The ILD lifetime is directly measured and used to calculate the bulk recombination current across injection levels. With this boundary+ILD lifetime model, we demonstrate the role of the ILD lifetime on many cell parameters in this PERC cell. For most high efficiency commercial p-type monocrystalline solar cells, the typically lower bulk lifetime at the maximum power point versus the lifetime at the open circuit point reduces the measured FF and pseudo-FF. This work illustrates that for a commercial PERC cell with AlOx rear passivation, the ILD lifetime is the primary mechanism behind reduced FF, ideality factors greater than 1, and the source of the J(02) term in the two-diode model. The crucial implications of this work are not only to better understand commercial PERC cell loss mechanisms but also to encourage a focus on different metrics in cell diagnostics. One such metric is the V-oc at 0.1 or 0.05suns. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available