4.0 Article

Microanalysis and preliminary pharmacokinetic studies of a sulfated polysaccharide from Laminaria japonica

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF OCEANOLOGY AND LIMNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 177-185

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s00343-015-4273-9

Keywords

sulfated polysaccharide; HPLC post-column derivatization; microanalysis; pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41376166]
  2. Ocean Public Welfare Scientific Research Project [201005024, 201405040]
  3. Jiangsu Science and Technology Project [BE2012687]
  4. Special Fund for Cooperation between Jilin Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences [2013SYHZ0023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid, sensitive and reproducible high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with post-column fluorescence derivatization has been developed to determine the amount of low-molecular-weight sulfated polysaccharide (GFS) in vivo. The metabolism of GFS has been shown to fit a two component model following its administration by intravenous injection, and its pharmacokinetic parameters were determined to be as follows: half-time of distribution phase (t (1/2 alpha))=11.24 +/- 2.93 min, half-time of elimination phase (t (1/2 beta))=98.20 +/- 25.78 min, maximum concentration (C (max))=110.53 mu g/mL and peak time (T (max))=5 min. The pharmacokinetic behavior of GFS was also investigated following intragastric administration. However, the concentration of GFS found in serum was too low for detection, and GFS could only be detected for up to 2 h after intragastric administration (200 mg/kg body weight). Thus, the bioavailability of GFS was low following intragastric administration because of the metabolism of GFS. In conclusion, HPLC with postcolumn derivatization could be used for quantitative microanalysis and pharmacokinetic studies to determine the presence of polysaccharides in the serum following intravenous injection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available