4.6 Article

DFT plus U as a reliable method for efficient ab initio calculations of nuclear materials

Journal

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 142-146

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.07.012

Keywords

Nuclear materials; ab initio modeling; Density functional theory; f-electrons; Actinide chemistry; Nuclear waste management

Funding

  1. Excellence Initiative of the German federal government
  2. Excellence Initiative of the German state government
  3. Julich Aachen Research Alliance - High-Performance Computing
  4. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  5. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [02NUK021A]
  6. JARA-HPC award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory (DFT)-based ab initio methods become standard research tools in various research fields, including nuclear materials science. However, having strongly correlated f-electrons, lanthanide- and actinide-bearing nuclear materials are computationally challenging for DFT methods and straightforward DFT calculations of these materials can easily produce false results. In this contribution we benchmark the DFT + U method, with the Hubbard U parameter derived ab initio, for prediction of structural and thermochemical parameters of nuclear materials, including various actinide bearing molecular complexes and lanthanide-bearing monazite- and xenotime-type prospective ceramic nuclear waste host forms. Our studies show that the applied DFT + U method improves significantly prediction of DFT by producing results with uncertainties similar to those of the higher order, but computationally unfeasible ab initio methods, and the experimental data, and thus allows for reliable and feasible ab initio computation of even chemically complex nuclear materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available