4.8 Review

Concepts and conflicts in nanoparticles reinforcement to polymers beyond hydrodynamics

Journal

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 1-58

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.09.002

Keywords

Reinforcement; Nanoparticles; Dynamics heterogeneity; Filler network; Non-hydrodynamic theories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573157, 51373149, 51333004]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [R14E030003]
  3. Major Projects of Science and Technology Plan of Guizhou Province, China [(2013)6016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With substantial progresses in reinforcement mechanism of nanoparticle filled polymers (NPFPs) beyond the hydrodynamic limit, now is the time to reconsider this topic characterized by emergence of a universal solid-like rheology at nanoparticle contents above a critical value in relation to the heterogeneously retarded polymer dynamics and structured filler network. A comprehensive survey is presented herein to report the cluster-cluster aggregation model, and jamming, percolation and soft colloidal dynamics theories and their applications in NPFPs in relation to nanoparticle reinforcement of polymers beyond hydrodynamics. Methods for separating the filler contribution to the reinforcement within the frame work of two-phase models are highlighted and three main kinds of theoretical models (cluster-cluster aggregation model, jamming theory, and rigidity percolation theory) are discussed for addressing the conflicts of concepts in experiments. Many years research practice shows that there is still lack of a credible relation describing the reinforcement with respect to the network structure (nanoparticle dispersity) mediated by microscopic interaction and sample preparation. Furthermore, viscoelasticity of the filler phase is discussed according to two-phase models and beyond. Finally several open challenges are remarked. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available