4.7 Article

Optimization of Fenton process using response surface methodology and analytic hierarchy process for landfill leachate treatment

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 150-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.019

Keywords

Leachate treatment; Fenton process; Response surface methodology; Analytic hierarchy process; Iron sludge reuse; Advance oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Typically, to treat landfill leachate, biological techniques alone are not sufficient. In this study, Fenton process was found to be effective as a pretreatment method. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to select the favorable catalyst between FeSO4 and FeCl2 when three criteria, namely, (i) COD removal, (ii) sludge to iron ratio, and (iii) risk were considered. Meanwhile, response surface methodology was applied to model and optimize three target responses, (i) COD removal, (ii) sludge to iron ratio, and (iii) organic removal to sludge ratio. The effective variables included pH, [H2O2]/[Fe(2+)1] Fe2+ dosage and reaction time. In addition, to minimize the danger, generated sludge was reused in the Fenton process. According to AHP sensitivity analysis results, priority percentage for FeC12 and FeSO4 were 64% and 36%, respectively. Additionally, according to the statistical analysis, all suggested models were adequate (with R-2 of 0.9171-0.9617). The optimum condition was found to be pH = 6, [H2O2]/[Fe2+] = 20 mole ratio, [Fe2+]= 170 mM, and reaction time =105 min. Results showed that [H2O2]/[Fe2+] and [Fe2+] are significant for COD removal while pH and [H2O2]/[Fe2+] were important factors for sludge to iron ratio (SIR) and organic removal to sludge ratio (ORSR), respectively. Meanwhile, when iron sludge was reused as catalyst, the results were acceptable even after five times regeneration. (C) 2016 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available