4.7 Review

Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2592

Keywords

ecological surprises; non-additive effects; global change; ecological experiments

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Canadian Healthy Oceans Network
  3. David H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship from the Cedartree Foundation
  4. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  5. Griffith University
  6. SFU/Griffith University Collaborative Travel Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interactions between multiple ecosystem stressors are expected to jeopardize biological processes, functions and biodiversity. The scientific community has declared stressor interactions-notably synergies-a key issue for conservation and management. Here, we review ecological literature over the past four decades to evaluate trends in the reporting of ecological interactions (synergies, antagonisms and additive effects) and highlight the implications and importance to conservation. Despite increasing popularity, and ever-finer terminologies, we find that synergies are (still) not the most prevalent type of interaction, and that conservation practitioners need to appreciate and manage for all interaction outcomes, including antagonistic and additive effects. However, it will not be possible to identify the effect of every interaction on every organism's physiology and every ecosystem function because the number of stressors, and their potential interactions, are growing rapidly. Predicting the type of interactions may be possible in the near-future, using meta-analyses, conservation-oriented experiments and adaptive monitoring. Pending a general framework for predicting interactions, conservation management should enact interventions that are robust to uncertainty in interaction type and that continue to bolster biological resilience in a stressful world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available