4.7 Article

Laetoli footprints reveal bipedal gait biomechanics different from those of modern humans and chimpanzees

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0235

Keywords

palaeoanthropology; locomotion; biomechanics; Laetoli

Funding

  1. Leakey Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation [BCS-1232522, BCS-1128170, DGE-080163, SMA-1409612, BCS-0935321, BCS-1515054]
  3. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  4. George Washington University's Research Enhancement Fund
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. SBE Off Of Multidisciplinary Activities [1409612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  8. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0935321, 1515054] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bipedalism is a key adaptation that shaped human evolution, yet the timing and nature of its evolution remain unclear. Here we use new experimentally based approaches to investigate the locomotor mechanics preserved by the famous Pliocene hominin footprints from Laetoli, Tanzania. We conducted footprint formation experiments with habitually barefoot humans and with chimpanzees to quantitatively compare their footprints to those preserved at Laetoli. Our results show that the Laetoli footprints are morphologically distinct from those of both chimpanzees and habitually barefoot modern humans. By analysing biomechanical data that were collected during the human experiments we, for the first time, directly link differences between the Laetoli and modern human footprints to specific biomechanical variables. We find that the Laetoli hominin probably used a more flexed limb posture at foot strike than modern humans when walking bipedally. The Laetoli footprints provide a clear snapshot of an early hominin bipedal gait that probably involved a limb posture that was slightly but significantly different from our own, and these data support the hypothesis that important evolutionary changes to hominin bipedalism occurred within the past 3.66 Myr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available