4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Eggs: good or bad?

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 259-264

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0029665116000215

Keywords

Eggs; Dietary; Cholesterol; CVD; Diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eggs have one of the lowest energy to nutrient density ratios of any food, and contain a quality of protein that is superior to beef steak and similar to dairy. From a nutritional perspective, this must qualify eggs as good'. The greater burden of proof has been to establish that eggs are not bad', by increasing awareness of the difference between dietary and blood cholesterol, and accumulating sufficient evidence to exonerate eggs from their associations with CVD and diabetes. After 60 years of research, a general consensus has now been reached that dietary cholesterol, chiefly from eggs, exerts a relatively small effect on serum LDL-cholesterol and CVD risk, in comparison with other diet and lifestyle factors. While dietary guidelines have been revised worldwide to reflect this view, associations between egg intake and the incidence of diabetes, and increased CVD risk in diabetes, prevail. These associations may be explained, in part, by residual confounding produced by other dietary components. The strength of evidence that links egg intake to increased CVD risk in diabetes is also complicated by variation in the response of serum LDL-cholesterol to eggs and dietary cholesterol in types 1 and 2 diabetes. On balance, the answer to the question as to whether eggs are bad', is probably no', but we do need to gain a better understanding of the effects of dietary cholesterol and its association with CVD risk in diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available