4.8 Article

Dopamine D2 receptor availability is linked to hippocampal-caudate functional connectivity and episodic memory

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606309113

Keywords

dopamine; memory; hippocampus

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Umea University
  3. Umea University-Karolinska Institute
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. Torsten and Ragnar Soderberg Foundation
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Research award
  7. Jochnick Foundation
  8. Swedish Brain Power
  9. Swedish Brain Foundation
  10. Vasterbotten County Council
  11. Max Planck Society
  12. German Research Foundation (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

D1 and D2 dopamine receptors (D1DRs and D2DRs) may contribute differently to various aspects of memory and cognition. The D1DR system has been linked to functions supported by the prefrontal cortex. By contrast, the role of the D2DR system is less clear, although it has been hypothesized that D2DRs make a specific contribution to hippocampus-based cognitive functions. Here we present results from 181 healthy adults between 64 and 68 y of age who underwent comprehensive assessment of episodic memory, working memory, and processing speed, along with MRI and D2DR assessment with [C-11]raclopride and PET. Caudate D2DR availability was positively associated with episodic memory but not with working memory or speed. Whole-brain analyses further revealed a relation between hippocampal D2DR availability and episodic memory. Hippocampal and caudate D2DR availability were interrelated, and functional MRI-based resting-state functional connectivity between the ventral caudate and medial temporal cortex increased as a function of caudate D2DR availability. Collectively, these findings indicate that D2DRs make a specific contribution to hippocampus-based cognition by influencing striatal and hippocampal regions, and their interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available