4.8 Article

Retinal neurodegeneration may precede microvascular changes characteristic of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes mellitus

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522014113

Keywords

diabetes; retina; neurodegeneration; diabetic retinopathy; optical coherence tomography

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EY018853, R01EY019112, R01EB004640, R01EY016379, R01EY017066]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness
  3. Wynn Institute for Vision Research
  4. Arnold and Mabel Beckman Initiative for Macular Research
  5. Netherlands Organization for Research (ZonMW)
  6. US Department of Veterans Affairs Rehab Service [I01 CX000119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) has long been recognized as a microvasculopathy, but retinal diabetic neuropathy (RDN), characterized by inner retinal neurodegeneration, also occurs in people with diabetes mellitus (DM). We report that in 45 people with DM and no to minimal DR there was significant, progressive loss of the nerve fiber layer (NFL) (0.25 mu m/y) and the ganglion cell (GC)/inner plexiform layer (0.29 mu m/y) on optical coherence tomography analysis (OCT) over a 4-y period, independent of glycated hemoglobin, age, and sex. The NFL was significantly thinner (17.3 mu m) in the eyes of six donors with DM than in the eyes of six similarly aged control donors (30.4 mu m), although retinal capillary density did not differ in the two groups. We confirmed significant, progressive inner retinal thinning in streptozotocin-induced type 1 and B6.BKS(D)-Lepr(db)/J type 2 diabetic mouse models on OCT; immunohistochemistry in type 1 mice showed GC loss but no difference in pericyte density or acellular capillaries. The results suggest that RDN may precede the established clinical and morphometric vascular changes caused by DM and represent a paradigm shift in our understanding of ocular diabetic complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available