4.8 Article

Reversal of a cyanobacterial bloom in response to early warnings

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612424114

Keywords

lake; bloom; resilience indicator; early warning; eutrophication

Funding

  1. Division of Environmental Biology of the National Science Foundation Grant [DEB 1144624]
  2. Rutgers University Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. Cooperative Institute of North Atlantic Region Grant [A101058]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1144624] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Directional change in environmental drivers sometimes triggers regime shifts in ecosystems. Theory and experiments suggest that regime shifts can be detected in advance, and perhaps averted, by monitoring resilience indicators such as variance and autocorrelation of key ecosystem variables. However, it is uncertain whether management action prompted by a change in resilience indicators can prevent an impending regime shift. We caused a cyanobacterial bloom by gradually enriching an experimental lake while monitoring an unenriched reference lake and a continuously enriched reference lake. When resilience indicators exceeded preset boundaries, nutrient enrichment was stopped in the experimental lake. Concentrations of algal pigments, dissolved oxygen saturation, and pH rapidly declined following cessation of nutrient enrichment and became similar to the unenriched lake, whereas a large bloom occurred in the continuously enriched lake. This outcome suggests that resilience indicators may be useful in management to prevent unwanted regime shifts, at least in some situations. Nonetheless, a safer approach to ecosystem management would build and maintain the resilience of desirable ecosystem conditions, for example, by preventing excessive nutrient input to lakes and reservoirs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available