4.8 Article

Janus effect of antifreeze proteins on ice nucleation

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614379114

Keywords

antifreeze proteins; ice nucleation; Janus effect; interfacial water; selective tethering

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51436004, 21421061, 11290164, 11204341, U1532260]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDA09020000]
  3. 973 Program [2013CB933800]
  4. Key Research Program of CAS [KJZD-EW-M03]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
  6. Shanghai Supercomputer Center of China
  7. Computer Network Information Center of CAS
  8. National Supercomputing Center in Shenzhen (Shenzhen Cloud Computing Center)
  9. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism of ice nucleation at the molecular level remains largely unknown. Nature endows antifreeze proteins (AFPs) with the unique capability of controlling ice formation. However, the effect of AFPs on ice nucleation has been under debate. Here we report the observation of both depression and promotion effects of AFPs on ice nucleation via selectively binding the ice-binding face (IBF) and the non-ice-binding face (NIBF) of AFPs to solid substrates. Freezing temperature and delay time assays show that ice nucleation is depressed with the NIBF exposed to liquid water, whereas ice nucleation is facilitated with the IBF exposed to liquid water. The generality of this Janus effect is verified by investigating three representative AFPs. Molecular dynamics simulation analysis shows that the Janus effect can be established by the distinct structures of the hydration layer around IBF and NIBF. Our work greatly enhances the understanding of the mechanism of AFPs at the molecular level and brings insights to the fundamentals of heterogeneous ice nucleation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available