4.5 Article

Adsorption and degradation of norfloxacin by a novel molecular imprinting magnetic Fenton-like catalyst

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1698-1704

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.08.030

Keywords

Fenton-like; Norfloxacin; Molecular imprinting; gamma-Fe2O3; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21407052]
  2. Key Project in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [2012BAC02B04]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [201201420087]
  4. SRF from ROCS and SEM
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014QN144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel magnetically separable adsorbent, molecular imprinting magnetic gamma-Fe2O3/crosslinked chitosan composites (MIPs), were prepared by a microemulsion process. Adsorption and Fenton-like oxidative degradation of a model pharmaceutical pollutant norfloxacin (NOR) by using MIPs were investigated. Various characterization methods were used to study the properties of MIPs, and it is suggested that the hydroxyl groups are the main adsorption sites for NOR. MIPs present better selective adsorption for NOR than its reference antibiotic sulfadiazine. The NOR adsorption data can be well fitted by Langmuir isotherm model and pseudosecond-order kinetic model. The optimum pH range for NOR adsorption is 7-10. In addition, the MIP-catalyzed Fenton-like system (MIPs/H2O2) exhibits remarkably faster removal rate for NOR than the case of gamma-Fe2O3/H2O2. The result indicates that MIPs will be a good functional material in decontamination of pharmaceutical wastewaters since MIPs can be magnetically recycled after the treatment. (C) 2015 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available