4.4 Article

Embryo-fetal erythroid cell selection from celomic fluid allows earlier prenatal diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 375-381

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4793

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundation Franco
  2. Piera Cutino ONLUS (Palermo, Italy)
  3. Project Sistema di purificazione di cellule fetali per indagini prenatali precoci, Linea di intervento del PO F.E.S.R. Sicilia [4.1.1.1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveCelocentesis, which involves aspiration of celomic fluid at 7-9weeks' gestation, can potentially provide early prenatal diagnosis of single-gene disorders. The main barrier to wide acceptability of this technique is contamination of the sample by maternal cells. This problem can be overcome through selection of embryo-fetal erythroid precursors, which are found in celomatic fluid. MethodEmbryo-fetal erythroid precursors were selected by an anti-CD71 MicroBeads method or by direct micromanipulator pickup of the cells selected on the basis of their morphology. ResultsIn our series of 302 singleton pregnancies at high risk for hemoglobinopathies, Celocentesis provided a sample of celomic fluid in all cases. In 100 (33.1%) samples, maternal contamination was absent or very low (<5%), and unambiguous results were obtained without the need for any preliminary procedures. In 160 (53%) cases, the contamination was between 5% and 60%, and selection of embryo-fetal erythroid precursors was successfully achieved by anti-CD71 MicroBeads. In 42 (13.9%) cases, the contamination was >60%, and selection of embryo-fetal cells was achieved by micromanipulation. In all 302 cases, there was concordance between DNA obtained from celomic fluid samples and fetal or newborn DNA. ConclusionsCelocentesis can be a reliable procedure for earlier prenatal diagnosis of fetal monogenic diseases. (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available