4.7 Article

Quality evaluation of intact acai and jucara fruit by means of near infrared spectroscopy

Journal

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 64-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.10.001

Keywords

Anthocyanin; Euterpe oleracea Mart; Euterpe edulis Mart; Classification; Partial least squares regression; Soluble solids content

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2008/51408-1, 2011/19669-2, 2013/0.6089-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to report the robustness of partial least squares regression (PLSR) models developed using FT-NIR reflectance spectra obtained from intact acai and jucara fruit. Mature fruit were collected over two years (6 populations of acari and jucara, totalling 505 samples). Diffuse reflectance spectra were acquired (64 scans and spectral resolution of 8 cm(-1)) using 25 fruits per batch on a 90 mm diameter glass dish in a single layer. Spectra were subject to several pre-processing procedures and two variable selection methods to develop the PLSR models. For total anthocyanin content (TAC) in acai, a PLSR model developed using the wavelength range of 1606-1793 nm, standard normal variate (SNV) and second derivative of Savitzky-Golay (SNV + d(2)A) achieved a bias corrected root mean square error (SEP) of 3.6 g kg(-1) and a R-p(2) of 0.7 in predicting an external independent set, which was better than PLSR models for jucara (SEP of 3.7 g kg(-1),R-p(2) of 0.5), and for both species combined (SEP of 5.7 g kg(-1), R-p(2) of 0.5). For soluble solids content (SSC) in gal the models developed using SNV + d(2)A spectra over the window of 1640-1738-nm achieved a bias-corrected SEP of 2.9% and R-p(2) of 0.8, similar to jucara (SEP of 1.1%, R-p(2) of 0.9) and for both species combined (SEP of 2.3%, R-p(2) of 0.8). The developed models can be used to sort acai and jucara based on SSC and TAC into two grades (low and high contents). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available