4.4 Article

Effect of varying the composition and nanostructure of organic carbonate-containing lyotropic liquid crystal polymer electrolytes on their ionic conductivity

Journal

POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 635-643

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pj.2015.119

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy via an STTR Grant [DE-FG02-04ER84093]
  2. NSF Liquid Crystal Materials Research Center at CU Boulder [DMR-0820579]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanostructured composite electrolyte films consisting of a cross-linked lyotropic liquid crystal (LLC) monomer, an organic carbonate liquid electrolyte (propylene carbonate, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate) and a Li salt (LiClO4, LiBF4, LiPF6) were systematically prepared and characterized at two electrolyte concentrations (0.245 and 1.0 M) and four liquid loading levels (5, 15, 30, 50 wt %). The LLC morphology of the films was investigated using polarized light microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction; their ionic conductivity was investigated using AC impedance measurements. Higher liquid electrolyte loadings and Li salt concentrations generally increased ionic conductivity, regardless of the liquid electrolyte or salt used. Some mixed-phase LLC morphologies displayed good ionic conductivity; however, as initially prepared, these formulations were at the limit of liquid uptake. In contrast, composites with a type II bicontinuous cubic (Q(II)) LLC phase containing ordered, three-dimensional interconnected nanopores exhibited good conductivity using much less liquid electrolyte and a lower Li salt concentration, indicating that this structure is more amenable to ion transport than less ordered/uniform morphologies. When wetted with electrolyte solution and integrated into Li/fluorinated carbon coin cells, the Q(II) films were sufficiently strong to act as an ion-conductive separator and displayed stable open-circuit potentials. Many of the mixed-phase films gave shorted cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available