4.7 Article

Enzymatic degradation of poly(butylene succinate) by cutinase cloned from Fusarium solani

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 211-219

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.10.012

Keywords

Fusarium solani; Poly(butylene succinate); Enzymatic degradation; Cutinase

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570097]
  2. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LJQ2014040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gene encoding cutinase from Fusarium solani was cloned and overexpressed in Pichia pastoris. The recombinant cutinase with a molecular weight of 24 kDa was then purified to homogeneity. The enzyme presents degradation capacity for poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and exhibits the optimum pH and temperature of 8.0 and 50 degrees C, respectively. Enzyme activity is enhanced by K+ and Na+ and inhibited by Zn2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, and Co2+. The inhibitions of different chemicals on recombinant enzyme activity were examined. EDTA and beta-mercaptoethanol exert significant inhibitory effect. The degradation of PBS films in the presence of the recombinant enzyme was further studied. Results showed that enzymatic degradation is a rapid process, and the PBS films were degraded completely after approximately 6 h. The characteristics of PBS films after degradation were analyzed. With the extension of degradation time, the surfaces of PBS films became rougher and holes appeared with a gradually increasing trend. Differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy analyses revealed that both amorphous and crystalline regions of PBS were degraded by the recombinant enzyme. Wide-angle X-ray diffractometer also indicated the crystallinity of PBS has a gradual downward trend with the extension of degradation time. Gel permeation chromatography showed the molecular weight of PBS has no obvious change before and after degradation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available