4.7 Article

Effect of adding nanoalumina and marble dust powder on the physical, mechanical, and thermo-mechanical characterization of dental composite

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages E321-E331

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.24131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CDOS, Jaipur [0290032/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, dental composites were fabricated by adding different weight percentages of nanoalumina (5-20 wt%) and marble dust powder (5-20 wt%) in the base monomer system comprised of Bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate, Tri-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, Camphorquinone, and Dimethyl Amino Ethyl Methacrylate. Physical and mechanical characterizations such as void content test, Micro-hardness test, Compressive strength, Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and thermo-gravimetric analysis were performed to evaluate/compare the contribution of each of the nanoalumina and marble dust powder to the performance of dental composite. The result of experiment was indicated that by the addition of 5 wt% of nanoalumina increased the hardness and compressive strength by 88.46% and 23.25% whereas addition of 5 wt% of marble powder increased the hardness and compressive strength by 51.27% and 21.2%, respectively. DMA results revealed that addition of nanoalumina up to 20 wt% increased the storage modulus by 112.2%, whereas, the addition of marble powder up to 20 wt% increased the storage modulus by 191.2%. The thermal stability of dental composite was decreased with the addition of nanoalumina from 0 to 20 wt% and increased with the addition of marble dust powder from 0 to 20 wt%. Finally, it can be concluded that apart from economical aspect, marble dust powder filled dental composite also exhibited better thermo-mechanical and thermal properties than that of nanoalumina filled dental composite. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:E321-E331, 2018. (c) 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available