4.6 Article

Acceptability of Parental Financial Incentives and Quasi-Mandatory Interventions for Preschool Vaccinations: Triangulation of Findings from Three Linked Studies

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156843

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme [HTA 11/97/01]
  2. Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence [MR/K023187/1]
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. National Institute for Health Research
  8. Wellcome Trust under UK Clinical Research Collaboration
  9. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MR/K02325X/1, MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. National Institute for Health Research [11/97/01, CDF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [HTA/11/97/01] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Childhood vaccinations are a core component of public health programmes globally. Recent measles outbreaks in the UK and USA have prompted debates about new ways to increase uptake of childhood vaccinations. Parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions (e.g. restricting entry to educational settings to fully vaccinated children) have been successfully used to increase uptake of childhood vaccinations in developing countries, but there is limited evidence of effectiveness in developed countries. Even if confirmed to be effective, widespread implementation of these interventions is dependent on acceptability to parents, professionals and other stakeholders. Methods We conducted a systematic review (n = 11 studies included), a qualitative study with parents (n = 91) and relevant professionals (n = 24), and an on-line survey with embedded discrete choice experiment with parents (n = 521) exploring acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations. Here we use Triangulation Protocol to synthesise findings from the three studies. Results There was a consistent recognition that incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions could be effective, particularly in more disadvantaged groups. Universal incentives were consistently preferred to targeted ones, but relative preferences for quasi-mandatory interventions and universal incentives varied between studies. The qualitative work revealed a consistent belief that financial incentives were not considered an appropriate motivation for vaccinating children. The costs of financial incentive interventions appeared particularly salient and there were consistent concerns in the qualitative work that incentives did not represent the best use of resources for promoting preschool vaccinations. Various suggestions for improving delivery of the current UK vaccination programme as an alternative to incentives and quasi-mandates were made. Conclusions Parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for increasing uptake of preschool vaccinations do not currently attract widespread enthusiastic support in the UK; but some potential benefits of these approaches are recognised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available