4.6 Article

The Perinatal Risk Index: Early Risks Experienced by Domestic Adoptees in the United States

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150486

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01 HD042608]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, U.S. PHS
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01 DA020585, T32 DA016184]
  4. National Institute of Mental Health
  5. OBSSR, NIH, U.S. PHS
  6. National Institute on Mental Health [T32 MH019927]
  7. [NIH-5K12HD050121-09]
  8. [K23DA037913]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to assess comprehensively the prevalence of perinatal risks experienced by a potentially high-risk yet understudied population of children domestically adopted in the United States. Data are from participant report and medical records from mothers (n = 580) who completed a domestic adoption placement with nonrelatives at or near birth (Mean placement age = 7 days). We describe a comprehensive measure of perinatal risks, including divergences from previous assessment tools and the incorporation of multiple reporters, and report the prevalence of various types of perinatal risks. The prevalence of each specific risk factor was generally low, although several risks were more prevalent in this sample than estimates from nationally representative publicly available data. Nearly the entire sample (99%) experienced some type of risk exposure. Birth mothers who placed their children for adoption domestically in the US experience higher levels of perinatal risks than the national average, but not for all specific types of risk. Thus, the developmental trajectories of children adopted domestically may systematically differ from the general population to the extent that these specific perinatal risks impact development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available