4.6 Article

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?

David Moher et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

In appreciation of the peer-review heroes from 2015

William Summerskill

LANCET (2016)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

Matchmaker aims to cut journal shopping

Robert H. S. Kraus

NATURE (2016)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Make peer review scientific

Drummond Rennie

NATURE (2016)

News Item Multidisciplinary Sciences

THE WAITING GAME

Kendall Powell

NATURE (2016)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Rewarding reviewers - sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained

Verity Warne

LEARNED PUBLISHING (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication

Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al.

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE (2015)

Review Neurosciences

Emerging trends in peer review - a survey

Richard Walker et al.

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping

Kyle Siler et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system

Philip F. Stahel et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Assessing Value in Biomedical Research The PQRST of Appraisal and Reward

John P. A. Ioannidis et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Review rewards

[Anonymous]

NATURE (2014)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

Apply market forces to peer review

Sascha Ott et al.

NATURE (2014)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Open access is tiring out peer reviewers

Martijn Arns

NATURE (2014)

Article Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications

Exploiting citation networks for large-scale author name disambiguation

Christian Schulz et al.

EPJ DATA SCIENCE (2014)

Editorial Material Biology

Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing

Miranda Robertson

BMC BIOLOGY (2013)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers

Adrian Mulligan et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

QUANTIFYING THE VOLUNTEER EFFORT OF SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWING

Mary Golden et al.

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY (2012)

Editorial Material Chemistry, Physical

A decade in numbers

[Anonymous]

NATURE MATERIALS (2012)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009

Mikael Laakso et al.

PLOS ONE (2011)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

No crisis in supply of peer reviewers

Tim Vines et al.

NATURE (2010)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Reviewing peer review

Bruce Alberts et al.

SCIENCE (2008)

Letter Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

An incentive solution to the peer review problem

Marc Hauser et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2007)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Measuring the quality of editorial peer review

T Jefferson et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)