4.7 Article

Ventilation/Perfusion Distribution Abnormalities In Morbidly Obese Subjects Before and After Bariatric Surgery

Journal

CHEST
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages 1127-1134

Publisher

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1749

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS) [PI 080311]
  2. CIBERES
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR661]
  4. Almirall

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global and growing public health problem. Bariatric surgery (BS) is indicated in patients with morbid obesity. To our knowledge, the effects of morbid obesity and BS on ventilation/perfusion ((V) over dot(A)/(Q) over dot) ratio distributions using the multiple inert gas elimination technique have never before been explored. METHODS: We compared respiratory and inert gas ((V) over dot(A)/(Q) over dot ratio distributions) pulmonary gas exchange, breathing both ambient air and 100% oxygen, in 19 morbidly obese women (BMI, 45 kg/m(2)), both before and 1 year after BS, and in eight normal-weight, never smoker, age-matched, healthy women. RESULTS: Before BS, morbidly obese individuals had reduced arterial Po-2 (76 +/- 2 mm Hg) and an increased alveolar-arterial Po-2 difference (27 +/- 2 mm Hg) caused by small amounts of shunt (4.3% +/- 1.1% of cardiac output), along with abnormally broadly unimodal blood flow dispersion (0.83 +/- 0.06). During 100% oxygen breathing, shunt increased twofold in parallel with a reduction of blood flow to low (V) over dot(A)/(Q) over dot units, suggesting the development of reabsorption atelectasis without reversion of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. After BS, body weight was reduced significantly (BMI, 31 kg/m(2)), and pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities were decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is associated with mild to moderate shunt and (V) over dot(A)/(Q) over dot imbalance. These abnormalities are reduced after BS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available