4.7 Article

Ordering of the Serum Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Test in Patients Receiving Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy An Avoidable but Common Error

Journal

CHEST
Volume 148, Issue 6, Pages 1447-1453

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-1061

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels may be decreased by use of ACE inhibitor (ACEI) medication. In this study, we determined how oft en ACE levels were measured in patients receiving ACEI therapy. METHODS: ACE levels analyzed over a 54-month preintervention time period at an academic medical center were reviewed retrospectively for tests performed during ACEI therapy. These data were compared with a large, deidentified dataset of ACE levels measured at a national reference laboratory; in vitro studies of ACEI inhibition; and liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry detection of lisinopril in a subset of clinical specimens. RESULTS: Over a 54-month period, 1,292 patients had ACE levels measured, with 108 patients (8.4%) receiving ACEI therapy at the time of testing. ACE levels measured for patients receiving ACEI therapy were substantially lower. In general, clinical teams did not recognize a medication effect on ACE levels. Introduction of a warning prompt in the electronic health record reduced the ordering of ACE levels in patients receiving ACEIs by > 60% in a 17-month post-intervention time period. The deidentified dataset of ACE levels at a reference laboratory showed a bimodal distribution, with a peak of very low ACE levels. Using liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry, the presence of lisinopril was confirmed in a subset of specimens with low ACE activity. In vitro studies of two different ACE assays showed significant inhibition of activity at clinically relevant concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of ACE activity is oft en measured for patients receiving ACEIs, potentially leading to low ACE concentrations and inaccurate interpretations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available