4.7 Article

Impact of anatomical traits of maize (Zea mays L.) leaf as affected by nitrogen supply and leaf age on bundle sheath conductance

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages 205-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.07.013

Keywords

Microstructure; Nitrogen content; Diffusive resistance; C-4 photosynthesis; Image analysis

Funding

  1. Research Council of the K.U. Leuven [OT 12/055]
  2. Research Fund Flanders [G.0645.13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism of photosynthesis in C-4 crops depends on the archetypal Kranz-anatomy. To examine how the leaf anatomy, as altered by nitrogen supply and leaf age, affects the bundle sheath conductance (g(bs)), maize (Zea mays L.) plants were grown under three contrasting nitrogen levels. Combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were done on fully grown leaves at two leaf ages. The measured data were analysed using a biochemical model of C-4 photosynthesis to estimate g(bs). The leaf microstructure and ultrastructure were quantified using images obtained from micro-computed tomography and microscopy. There was a strong positive correlation between g(bs) and leaf nitrogen content (LNC) while old leaves had lower g(bs) than young leaves. Leaf thickness, bundle sheath cell wall thickness and surface area of bundle sheath cells per unit leaf area (S-b) correlated well with g(bs) although they were not significantly affected by LNC. As a result, the increase of g(bs) with LNC was little explained by the alteration of leaf anatomy. In contrast, the combined effect of LNC and leaf age on S-b was responsible for differences in g(bs) between young leaves and old leaves. Future investigations should consider changes at the level of plasmodesmata and membranes along the CO2 leakage pathway to unravel LNC and age effects further. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available