4.7 Article

Chemotaxis signaling systems in model beneficial plant-bacteria associations

Journal

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 549-559

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-016-0432-4

Keywords

Flagella; Motility; Nitrogen fixation; Rhizosphere; Signal transduction; Symbiosis

Funding

  1. NSERC Canada RGPIN [2015-03926]
  2. [NSF-330344]
  3. [NSF-1253234]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1253234] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beneficial plant-microbe associations play critical roles in plant health. Bacterial chemotaxis provides a competitive advantage to motile flagellated bacteria in colonization of plant root surfaces, which is a prerequisite for the establishment of beneficial associations. Chemotaxis signaling enables motile soil bacteria to sense and respond to gradients of chemical compounds released by plant roots. This process allows bacteria to actively swim towards plant roots and is thus critical for competitive root surface colonization. The complete genome sequences of several plant-associated bacterial species indicate the presence of multiple chemotaxis systems and a large number of chemoreceptors. Further, most soil bacteria are motile and capable of chemotaxis, and chemotaxis-encoding genes are enriched in the bacteria found in the rhizosphere compared to the bulk soil. This review compares the architecture and diversity of chemotaxis signaling systems in model beneficial plant-associated bacteria and discusses their relevance to the rhizosphere lifestyle. While it is unclear how controlling chemotaxis via multiple parallel chemotaxis systems provides a competitive advantage to certain bacterial species, the presence of a larger number of chemoreceptors is likely to contribute to the ability of motile bacteria to survive in the soil and to compete for root surface colonization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available