4.7 Article

Evaluation of Rotational Biopesticide Programs for Disease Management in Organic Cucurbit Production

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages 2226-2233

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0252-RE

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) through the Organic Transitions Program [2014-51106-22090]
  2. NIFA [2014-51106-22090, 687484] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) and powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii) are two of the most economically important and widespread cucurbit diseases. Disease management relies primarily on fungicide use, but frequent fungicide applications can lead to the development of resistant pathogen populations. In addition, more vegetables are being produced with organic practices, which prohibit the use of many fungicides. Incorporating biorational products into a disease management program may help mitigate the risk of fungicide resistance development while being compatible with organic production. Field trials were conducted for two years on organically managed land in Maryland with cucumber, muskmelon, pumpkin, and butternut squash to evaluate the efficacy of four biorational products (i.e., Actinovate AG, OxiDate, Regalia, and Serenade Soil) when applied in a rotational program with copper against foliar cucurbit diseases. Generally, all biorational treatments resulted in significantly lower downy and powdery mildew severity compared with the nontreated plants, but the level of disease management was not significantly different than that provided by copper alone. However, Actinovate AG, OxiDate, and Serenade Soil each improved disease management on at least one crop, as compared with copper alone. Rotational programs with biopesticides are a viable disease management option for organic production of field-grown cucurbits in Maryland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available