4.7 Article

Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits is Associated With Genetically Diverse Pseudomonas syringae Strains

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages 1397-1404

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-11-15-1332-RE

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1012059]
  2. US Department of Education
  3. US Department of Agriculture
  4. Florida Watermelon Association
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1012059] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Angular leaf spot of cucurbits is generally considered to be caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans. It has a worldwide distribution and has been observed to emerge sporadically under humid and wet conditions. Reports of multiple P. syringae pathovars associated with the disease and lack of molecular analysis has left the true diversity of populations in the United States unclear. In this study, we collected 27 P. syringae strains causing foliar lesions and blighting on watermelon, cantaloupe, and squash in Florida, Georgia, and California over several years. Strains were fluorescent on King's medium B agar and displayed the typical phenotypic and biochemical characteristics of P. syringae. P. syringae pv. lachrymans is a member of genomospecies 2. However, the genetic profiles obtained through both MLSA (gyrB, rpoD, gapA, and gltA) and BOX-PCR (BOXA1R) identified 26 of the P. syringae strains to be distributed among three clades within genomospecies 1, and phylogenetically distinct from genomospecies 2 member P. syringae pv. lachrymans. A novel MLSA haplotype of the pathogen common to all states and cucurbit hosts was identified. Considerable genetic diversity among P. syringae strains infecting cucurbits is associated with the same disease, and reflects the larger ecological diversity of P. syringae populations from genomospecies 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available