4.7 Article

Prevalence of Sugarcane yellow leaf virus in Sugarcane-Producing Regions in Kenya Revealed by Reverse-Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 260-268

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0602-RE

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Agropolis Fondation [1101-004]
  2. African Women in Agricultural Research and Development (AWARD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Yellow leaf (YL) is a disease of sugarcane that is currently widespread throughout most American and Asian sugarcane-producing countries. However, its actual distribution in Africa remains largely unknown. A reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay was developed to facilitate and improve the detection of Sugarcane yellow leaf virus (SCYLV), the causal agent of YL. The RT-LAMP assay was found to be comparable with or superior to conventional RT-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of SCYLV genotypes CUB and BRA in infected sugarcane 'C132-81' and 'SP71-6163', respectively. Additionally, 68 sugarcane samples that tested negative by RT-PCR were found positive by RT-LAMP, whereas the RT-LAMP assay failed to detect SCYLV in only 5 samples that tested positive by RT-PCR. Combining RT-PCR and RT-LAMP data enabled the detection of SCYLV in 86 of 183 Kenyan sugarcane plants, indicating high SCYLV prevalence throughout the country (ranging from 36 to 64% in individual counties). Seminested PCR assays were developed that enabled the amplification of a fragment encompassing the capsid protein coding region gene and its flanking 5' and 3' genomic regions. Sequences of this fragment for four Kenyan SCYLV isolates indicated that they shared 99.2 to 99.6% pairwise identity with one another and clearly clustered phylogenetically with SCYLV-BRA genotype isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first report of SCYLV in Kenya.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available