4.7 Article

Temperature Affects Aggressiveness and Fungicide Sensitivity of Four Pythium spp. that Cause Soybean and Corn Damping Off in Iowa

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 583-591

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-04-15-0487-RE

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Iowa Soybean Association
  2. United Soybean Board
  3. North Central Soybean Research Project
  4. Iowa Corn Promotion Board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Damping off of soybean and corn, caused by Pythium spp., is favored by cool temperatures and wet soil conditions and is primarily managed using fungicide seed treatments. The goal of this research was to determine the effect of temperature on aggressiveness and fungicide sensitivity of Pythium spp. recovered from soybean and corn in Iowa. A total of 21 isolates of four of the most prevalent Pythium spp. in Iowa were screened. Seed and seedling assays were used to quantify the aggressiveness of P. lutarium, P. oopapillum, P. sylvaticum, and P. torulosum on soybean and corn at 13, 18, and 23 degrees C. Isolates recovered from soybean or corn were equally pathogenic on both hosts. P. torulosum was more aggressive at 13 degrees C compared with 18 and 23 degrees C. Conversely, P. sylvaticum was more aggressive at 18 and 23 degrees C than at 13 degrees C. A plate assay was used to assess fungicide sensitivity to seven fungicides that are commonly used as seed treatments, and EC50 values at each of the three temperatures were determined and compared. EC50 values for P. torulosum were higher for all fungicides tested at 13 degrees C, compared with 18 or 23 degrees C, whereas EC50 values for P. sylvaticum were higher for all fungicides at 18 and 23 degrees C compared with 13 degrees C. These data contribute to our understanding of the effect of soil temperature on the risk of soybean and corn damping off, which may aid in the development of more effective management practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available