4.7 Article

Stomatal acclimation to vapour pressure deficit doubles transpiration of small tree seedlings with warming

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 2221-2234

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12790

Keywords

humidity; sap flux; stomata; stomatal conductance; temperature; warming experiment

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF DOB grant [1136717]
  2. Department of the Interior Southeast Climate Science Center [G11AC20471, G13AC00405]
  3. National Institute of Climate Change Research [NICCR-DE-FC02-06ER64156, 10-NICCR-1109]
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [F09A10379]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future climate change is expected to increase temperature (T) and atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD) in many regions, but the effect of persistent warming on plant stomatal behaviour is highly uncertain. We investigated the effect of experimental warming of 1.9-5.1 degrees C and increased VPD of 0.5-1.3 kPa on transpiration and stomatal conductance (g(s)) of tree seedlings in the temperate forest understory (Duke Forest, North Carolina, USA). We observed peaked responses of transpiration to VPD in all seedlings, and the optimum VPD for transpiration (D-opt) shifted proportionally with increasing chamber VPD. Warming increased mean water use of Carya by 140% and Quercus by 150%, but had no significant effect on water use of Acer. Increased water use of ring-porous species was attributed to (1) higher air Tand (2) stomatal acclimation to VPD resulting in higher gs and more sensitive stomata, and thereby less efficient water use. Stomatal acclimation maintained homeostasis of leaf Tand carbon gain despite increased VPD, revealing that short-term stomatal responses to VPD may not be representative of long-term exposure. Acclimation responses differ from expectations of decreasing gs with increasing VPD and may necessitate revision of current models based on this assumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available