4.8 Article

S-Type Anion Channels SLAC1 and SLAH3 Function as Essential Negative Regulators of Inward K+ Channels and Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 949-965

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.15.01050

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973program) [2012CB114300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170227]
  3. Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2010OHTP06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drought stress induces stomatal closure and inhibits stomatal opening simultaneously. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is still largely unknown. Here, we show that the slow-type (S-type) anion channels SLAC1 and SLAH3 mainly inhibit the inward-rectifying K+ channel KAT1 by protein-protein interaction and consequently prevent stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Voltage-clamp results demonstrated that SLAC1 inhibited KAT1 dramatically but did not inhibit KAT2. SLAH3 inhibited KAT1 to a lesser extent than did SLAC1. Both the N and C termini of SLAC1 inhibited KAT1, but the inhibition by the N terminus was stronger. The C terminus was essential for SLAC1-mediated inhibition of KAT1. Furthermore, drought stress strongly upregulated the expression of SLAC1 and SLAH3 in Arabidopsis guard cells, and the overexpression of wildtype and truncated SLAC1 dramatically impaired inward K+ (K-in(+)) currents of guard cells and light-induced stomatal opening. Additionally, the inhibition of KAT1 by SLAC1 and KC1 only partially overlapped, suggesting that SLAC1 and KC1 inhibited K+ in channels via different molecular mechanisms. Taken together, these findings reveal a novel regulatory mechanism for stomatal movement, in which signaling pathways for stomatal closure and opening are directly coupled by protein-protein interaction between SLAC1/SLAH3 and KAT1 in Arabidopsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available