4.1 Article

Novel antibiotics regeneration and genetic transformation with RsMYB1 gene of recalcitrant chrysanthemum cv. Shinma

Journal

PLANT BIOSYSTEMS
Volume 151, Issue 1, Pages 98-107

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2015.1103800

Keywords

Anthocyanin; antibiotic; ploidy level; selection marker; transgenic plant

Categories

Funding

  1. Bio-industry Technology Development Program, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Republic of Korea
  2. Kyungpook National University Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research was conducted to develop genetic transformation of the recalcitrant chrysanthemum cv. Shinma by application of appropriate antibiotics and selective agents. Clavamox had the least inhibitory effect on shoot regeneration compared to timentin, carbenicillin, and cefotaxime. Clavamox, at a concentration of 125mgL(-1), was found to be the most suitable for shoot regeneration and production of quality shoots, suppressing the growth of Agrobacterium in explants infected with strains GV3101 or C58C1 for 3 and 4weeks, respectively. The concentration of phosphinothricin (PPT) was found to be 1.0mgL(-1) for screening of putative transgenic shoots. Moreover, transgenic chrysanthemums were obtained by culturing explants co-cultivated with A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 harboring an anthocyanin regulatory gene RsMYB1 isolated from radish (Raphanus sativus), which was placed under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus promoter (CaMV) 35S and petal-specific promoter InMYB1 isolated from the morning glory (Ipomoea nil), on shoot regeneration medium supplemented with recommended concentration of antibiotic and selective agent. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that there was no variation in ploidy level between transgenic plants and donor plants (non-transformants). To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of Clavamox and MYB transcription factor for genetic transformation of this chrysanthemum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available