4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Which root architectural elements contribute the best to anchorage of Pinus species? Insights from in silico experiments

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 411, Issue 1-2, Pages 275-291

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-2992-0

Keywords

Root system architecture; Numerical modelling; Root anchorage; Root stress; Failure patterns

Funding

  1. Aquitaine Region
  2. FAST-A project
  3. French National Research Agency (ANR)
  4. TWIST [ANR-13-JS06-0006]
  5. FOR-WIND [ANR-12-AGRO-0007]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-JS06-0006] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root anchorage function is crucial for tree survival as most trees are exposed to recurrent wind throughout their lifespan. Trees exhibit a large variability of root system architecture (RSA) due genetic and environmental factors. This study aims to understand the links between RSA and tree stability. A 3D biomechanical model was used to simulate tree overturning. To capture the variability of sinker RSA, fourteen virtual root patterns were created from an ensemble average of measured Pinus pinaster root systems. Root virtual patterns and tree-pulling simulations were verified against experimental data. The model predicts realistic tree anchorage strength, root stress, and failure patterns. Only a few root components contribute significantly to anchorage strength. The taproot contributes the most to anchorage rigidity, representing 61 % of the anchorage strength. The windward roots failure drives ultimate anchorage failure, representing 25 % of the anchorage strength. Simulations show that root secondary thickening induces higher anchorage rigidity and increases anchorage strength by 58 %. This innovative approach appears promising for describing tree stability and its acclimation to external constraints.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available