4.7 Article

Compost vs biochar amendment: a two-year field study evaluating soil C build-up and N dynamics in an organically managed olive crop

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 408, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-14

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-2794-4

Keywords

Organic farming; Nitrous oxide; Olive mill waste compost; Semi-arid

Funding

  1. EU - European Commission, Directorate General for Research & Innovation within 7th Framework Programme of RTD [FP7 KBBE.2011.1.2-02]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the high interest in biochar as soil amendment, the number of field studies is still limited, being experiments with perennial crops in arid lands particularly lacking. This study evaluated the application of compost and biochar in a drip-irrigated organic olive crop in a calcareous soil in South-East Spain. During two consecutive years, changes in soil total organic C (TOC), dissolved organic C (DOC) and water soluble N (WSN), mineral N (NH4 (+) and NO3 (-)), N2O emissions, denitrifying enzyme activity (DEA) and number of amoA gen copies were monitored. Biochar increased TOC compared to the rest of treatments, whereas DOC and WSN significantly increased in plots amended with compost and the compost-biochar mixture. DEA, amoA-encoding genes and N2O emissions were highest with the compost-biochar mixture, but results were not always significant. Our results show that, in these N-limited and deficit irrigated semi-arid agro-ecosystems, compost amendment has an impact on soil microbiological activity with a link to N availability. Biochar applied alone does not alter the N dynamics, but markedly builds-up soil C. In both cases only during the first year these effects were statistically significant. When applied in combination a synergistic effect was observed and the highest values of DEA, amoA gene copies and N2O emissions were detected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available