4.7 Review

The value of soil respiration measurements for interpreting and modeling terrestrial carbon cycling

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 413, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-25

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-3084-x

Keywords

Soil respiration; Data-model fusion; Carbon; CO2

Funding

  1. NSF Advances in Biological Informatics [1062204, 1457897]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science
  3. US Department of Agriculture [201302758, 2014-67003-22070]
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy as part of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program
  5. U.S. Department of Energy
  6. National Science Foundation [PLR-1417763, DBI-959333, AGS-1005663]
  7. University of Chicago
  8. MBL Lillie Research Innovation Award
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1062204, 1458021, 1457897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1457890] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. NIFA [2014-67003-22070, 688554] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An acceleration of model-data synthesis activities has leveraged many terrestrial carbon datasets, but utilization of soil respiration (R-S) data has not kept pace. We identify three major challenges in interpreting R-S data, and opportunities to utilize it more extensively and creatively: (1) When R-S is compared to ecosystem respiration (R-ECO) measured from EC towers, it is not uncommon to find R-S > R-ECO. We argue this is most likely due to difficulties in calculating R-ECO, which provides an opportunity to utilize R-S for EC quality control. (2) R-S integrates belowground heterotrophic and autotrophic activity, but many models include only an explicit heterotrophic output. Opportunities exist to use the total R-S flux for data assimilation and model benchmarking methods rather than less-certain partitioned fluxes. (3) R-S is generally measured at a very different resolution than that needed for comparison to EC or ecosystem- to global-scale models. Downscaling EC fluxes to match the scale of R-S, and improvement of R-S upscaling techniques will improve resolution challenges. R-S data can bring a range of benefits to model development, particularly with larger databases and improved data sharing protocols to make R-S data more robust and broadly available to the research community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available