4.7 Article

The Significance of Mycobacterium abscessus Subspecies abscessus Isolation During Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease Therapy

Journal

CHEST
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages 1369-1375

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1297

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler
  2. Amon G. Carter Foundation, Ft. Worth, TX
  3. Moncrief Foundation, Ft. Worth, TX

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Isolation of Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies abscessus (MAA) is common during Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease therapy, but there is limited information about the clinical significance of the MAA isolates. METHODS: We identified 53 of 180 patients (29%) treated for MAC lung disease who had isolation of MAA during MAC lung disease therapy. Patients were divided into those without (group 1) and those with (group 2) MAA lung disease. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences between patients with and without MAA isolation or between groups 1 and 2. Group 1 and 2 patients had similar total sputum cultures obtained (P = .7; 95% CI, -13.4 to 8.6) and length of follow-up (P = .8; 95% CI, -21.5 to 16.1). Group 2 patients had significantly more total positive cultures for MAA (mean +/- SD, 15.0 +/- 11.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.4; P < .0001; 95% CI, -17.7 to -9.9), were significantly more likely to develop new or enlarging cavitary lesions while on MAC therapy (P > .0001), and were significantly more likely to meet all three American Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria for nontuberculous mycobacterial disease (21 of 21 [100%] vs 0 of 32 [0%]; P < .0001) compared with group 1 patients. Group 1 patients were significantly more likely to have single, positive MAA cultures than group 2 patients (25 of 31 vs 0 of 21; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiologic and clinical follow-up after completion of MAC lung disease therapy is required to determine the significance of MAA isolated during MAC lung disease therapy. Single MAA isolates are not likely to be clinically significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available