4.5 Article

Effect of botanical extracts containing carnosic acid or rosmarinic acid on learning and memory in SAMP8 mice

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 328-338

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.013

Keywords

Carnosic acid; Rosmarinic acid; Learning; Memory; SAMP8 mice

Funding

  1. Kemin Foods, LC
  2. VA Medical Center, St Louis, MO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative damage is one of the hallmarks of the aging process. The current study evaluated effects of two proprietary antioxidant-based ingredients, rosemary extract and spearmint extract containing carnosic acid and rosmarinic acid, respectively, on learning and memory in the SAMP8 mouse model of accelerated aging. The two rosemary extracts contained carnosic acid (60% or 10% carnosic acid) and one spearmint extract contained 5% rosmarinic acid. Three doses of actives in each extract were tested: 32, 16, 1.6 or 0 mg/kg. After 90 days of treatment mice were tested in T-maze foot shock avoidance, object recognition and lever press. Rosemary extract containing 60% carnosic acid improved acquisition and retention in T-maze foot shock, object recognition and lever press. Rosemary extract with 10% carnosic acid improved retention in T-maze foot shock avoidance and lever press. Spearmint with 5% rosmarinic acid improved acquisition and retention in T-maze foot shock avoidance and object recognition. 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) was reduced in the brain cortex after treatment with all three extracts (P < 0.001) compared to the vehicle treated SAMP8. Protein carbonyls Were reduced in the hippo campus after administration of rosemary with 10% carnosic acid (P < 0.05) and spearmint containing 5% rosmarinic acid (P < 0.001). The current results indicate that the extracts from spearmint and rosemary have beneficial effects on learning and memory and brain tissue markers of oxidation that occur with age in SAMP8 mice. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available