4.8 Article

How Isotropic is the Universe?

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 117, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.131302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Perren Fund
  2. IMPACT fund
  3. RAS Small Grant Scheme
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council in the UK
  5. Royal Society
  6. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) / ERC [306478-CosmicDawn]
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M011852/1]
  8. NASA Office of Space Science
  9. ESA Member States
  10. NASA
  11. EPSRC [EP/M011852/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. STFC [ST/N000811/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M011852/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fundamental assumption in the standard model of cosmology is that the Universe is isotropic on large scales. Breaking this assumption leads to a set of solutions to Einstein's field equations, known as Bianchi cosmologies, only a subset of which have ever been tested against data. For the first time, we consider all degrees of freedom in these solutions to conduct a general test of isotropy using cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization data from Planck. For the vector mode (associated with vorticity), we obtain a limit on the anisotropic expansion of (sigma(V)/H)(0) < 4.7 x 10(-11) (95% C. L.), which is an order of magnitude tighter than previous Planck results that used cosmic microwave background temperature only. We also place upper limits on other modes of anisotropic expansion, with the weakest limit arising from the regular tensor mode, (sigma(T),reg/ H)(0) < 1.0 x 10(-6) (95% C. L.). Including all degrees of freedom simultaneously for the first time, anisotropic expansion of the Universe is strongly disfavored, with odds of 121 000:1 against.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available